The report argues that contemporary societies face an epistemic rupture: a systemic breakdown in shared trust, institutional credibility, and consensus reality, driven by the convergence of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and cultic ideologies. To conceptualise this crisis, the author introduces “interconnected realities,” overlapping systems of meaning that flourish through cognitive biases, emotional contagion, and charismatic authority, often rejecting empirical accountability in favour of affective resonance (Wood, 2016). Psychological traits such as schizotypy, which is linked to magical thinking (Brugger & Mohr, 2008), and social dominance orientation, which legitimises hierarchical worldviews (Sidanius & Pratto, 2001), predispose individuals to these beliefs. Such predispositions are amplified by digital platforms that reward emotionally charged content, thereby normalising conspiratorial thinking and pseudoscientific mimicry (Bruns et al., 2020).
The text demonstrates that pseudoscience functions as “sacred infrastructure” within what Ward and Voas (2011) term conspirituality: a fusion of New Age spirituality and anti-government conspiracy. Pseudoscientific performances—lab coats, technical jargon, citation-heavy slides—simulate scientific legitimacy while evading falsifiability, allowing movements to cloak spiritual or political aims in empirical dress (Fasce & Picó, 2019). This strategy is visible in alternative health subcultures promoting “quantum healing,” in climate-denial forums citing outlier studies, and in “sovereign citizen” networks that misuse legal terminology to challenge state authority (Taplin, 2023).
Australian case studies reveal how settler conspirituality weaponises this mimicry to appropriate Aboriginal identity. Non-Indigenous actors invoke faux-spiritual lore, pseudo-heritage claims, and pseudolegal rhetoric to oppose legitimate Aboriginal governance, thereby sustaining white possession under a guise of mystical custodianship (Moreton-Robinson, 2015). Such Pretendian practices leverage public ignorance and weak verification regimes, undermining both Indigenous sovereignty and institutional legitimacy (Carlson & Day, 2023).
The psychology of conspiratorial cognition is mapped across traits—schizotypy, need for closure, epistemic mistrust—that predispose believers to closed, self-sealing explanations (Imhoff & Bruder, 2014). Digital algorithms intensify these vulnerabilities by curating personalised feeds that privilege sensationalism over evidence, steering users toward progressively extreme content (Ribeiro et al., 2020). Platforms thus serve as affective infrastructures that automate radicalisation, while generative AI and deepfakes further erode the possibility of objective archival truth (Lewandowsky et al., 2021).
Cultic dynamics follow a lifecycle of seduction, entrapment, indoctrination, and, less often, exit and recovery (Lalich & McLaren, 2018). Online, this lifecycle accelerates: initial contact occurs through visually appealing wellness pages or activist groups; entrapment proceeds by isolating users from dissenting voices; indoctrination substitutes empirical standards with intuitive epistemologies; recovery necessitates trauma-informed care and community reintegration (Langone et al., 2021). The author contends that many conspiratorial and pseudoscientific communities now operate as decentralised digital cults, lacking a single leader yet sustained by algorithmic reinforcement and charismatic micro-influencers.
To counter epistemic collapse, the report proposes a multi-layered strategy. Institutional trust must be rebuilt through participatory governance and transparent science communication that acknowledges uncertainty without ceding authority (Fetterman et al., 2019). Education should integrate critical thinking with moral reasoning, media literacy, and exposure to diverse epistemologies, including Indigenous knowledge systems, which model relational accountability and community-based validation (Norman et al., 2025). Digital platforms require redesign: regulatory incentives should shift algorithms from engagement maximisation to resilience building, while public digital literacy programs must teach users to decode scientific aesthetics and recognise pseudoscientific mimicry (Schmid & Betsch, 2022). Finally, cultural renewal demands spaces where truth is animated by curiosity, awe, and collective storytelling, offering the sense of wonder currently monopolised by pseudoscientific narratives.
In conclusion, the author frames the struggle over truth as both a civic and psychological imperative. Epistemic repair involves not just debunking falsehoods but cultivating environments where evidence, empathy, and accountability can thrive. By weaving together psychological insight, digital critique, Indigenous sovereignty, and critical pedagogy, the report offers a blueprint for reclaiming reality in an age of hyperbelief.
Bungaree.org 
Leave a comment