This report offers a critical analysis of statistical distortions arising from Indigenous identification change and simulated Indigeneity in Australia’s census and policy frameworks. It argues that the unchecked growth of self-reported Indigenous identity; especially among individuals without genealogical descent or community recognition—has compromised the effectiveness of national equity policies like Closing the Gap.
Key Statistics and Patterns
Between 1971 and 2021, Australia’s Indigenous population increased from about 115,000 to over 812,000 people. While some growth reflects demographic trends, up to 80 percent of the increase between 2011 and 2016 was attributed to identification change—individuals newly self-identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (Biddle & Markham, 2018). A further 25 percent rise was recorded in the 2021 Census, largely continuing this trend (ABS, 2022a).
These new identifiers are often urban-based and statistically more advantaged than long-recognised Indigenous populations. Their inclusion in datasets has resulted in what researchers call identity inflation: artificial gains in areas like education, employment, or housing outcomes that mask ongoing structural disadvantage experienced by genealogically grounded Aboriginal communities.
From Demographics to Epistemic Crisis
The report positions this statistical shift as an crisis, not merely a methodological concern. It describes the growing presence of simulated Indigeneity, performances of Aboriginal identity that lack cultural authority, as a form of epistemic noise. These simulations distort census data, misguide funding allocation, and weaken policy accountability. They also displace authentic community representatives in media, governance, and public forums.
By relying on unverified self-identification, institutions like the ABS have inadvertently created a loophole through which settler Australians can access benefits, platforms, or symbolic power reserved for Aboriginal peoples. This contributes to what Darnett (2025) and Carlson (2022) call the hollowing out of Aboriginal representation: the displacement of legitimate voices by performative ones that conform to settler expectations.
Cultural and Structural Consequences
The report outlines how sacredness, governance, and cultural identity have been co-opted through sacred simulation. Non-Indigenous individuals and groups invoke Aboriginal language, ceremony, and spiritual rhetoric in public controversies, particularly in land and heritage disputes, despite lacking any genealogical legitimacy. This mimicry interferes with Aboriginal-led planning processes, erodes trust in cultural institutions, and confuses the public about who speaks with authority on Aboriginal matters.
These dynamics, when scaled, result in statistical sabotage. The report explains how programs intended to improve Aboriginal life expectancy, housing, and education are compromised when census figures include individuals who have not experienced the systemic barriers these programs seek to address. As a result, Closing the Gap metrics may show illusory progress, while entrenched inequality persists.
Call for Genealogical Justice and Data Sovereignty
To resolve these issues, the report advocates for genealogical justice: the restoration of authentic Indigenous descent lines and community recognition in policy systems. It calls for mandatory use of AIATSIS’ tripartite definition—descent, self-identification, and community recognition—in all public data and eligibility systems. This would ensure only those with verified cultural and kinship ties are counted in Indigenous population figures.
Additionally, it recommends embedding Indigenous data sovereignty into national statistical systems. Aboriginal communities should control how identity is defined, how data is collected, and how it informs programs and funding. This includes community-led genealogical repair initiatives, archival access, and truth-telling mechanisms.
Conclusion: Restoring Truth and Authority
The report concludes that simulated Indigeneity is not a benign expression of identity, but a structural form of symbolic violence. It undermines Aboriginal sovereignty, distorts the national story, and misdirects resources. Reforms must move beyond symbolic inclusion toward structural accountability: privileging community validation, cultural continuity, and genealogical legitimacy.
Restoring integrity to Closing the Gap requires rebuilding trust in who is counted, by what standards, and to what end. Only then can national statistics support the just aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Bungaree.org 
Leave a comment